Completed Match

Full leg data

Players Championship 20 • T64 • 4 Sept 2023, 00:00 UTC • Best of 15 legs

WinnerScott Waites
Score6–3
DataFull leg data

Why this match was won

Post-match verdict

Scott Waites won 6–3. The result was driven by a 19.0 percentage point checkout edge for van Trijp.

Average gap0.7 ptsvan Trijp led the 3-dart average.
Checkout gap19.0 ptsvan Trijp finished cleaner on doubles.
Leg flowNo runvan Trijp had the longest scoring burst.
Pre-match edgeNo clean edgePrediction unavailable

Pre-match edge post-mortem

Prediction unavailable
No clean edge

There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.

Match comparison

One table, no stat-card cosplay
Scott Waitesvan Trijp
86.5
3-dart averagevan Trijp edge
87.2
99
First 9 averageScott Waites edge
93.5
27.0%
Checkout %van Trijp edge
46.0%
40
100+Level
40
14
140+Level
14
3
180sLevel
3
68
Highest checkoutLevel
68

Key performance insights

Driven by the final stat split and leg availability
van Trijp was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 19.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scott Waites set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 5.5 point First 9 advantage.
Waites took the final leg, closing the match at 0–3.

Leg-flow story

Runs, breaks, and decisive legs
Waites closed the final leg at 0–3.

Scoring and finishing

Volume plus conversion
Scott Waites
3-dart avg86.5
180s / 140+ / 100+3 / 14 / 40
Checkout %27.0%
Highest checkout68
Checkouts3/11
van Trijp
3-dart avg87.2
180s / 140+ / 100+3 / 14 / 40
Checkout %46.0%
Highest checkout68
Checkouts6/13

Momentum strip

Match flow by leg
L1Waites
L2van Trijp
L3Waites
L4van Trijp
L5Waites
L6Waites
L7van Trijp
L8Waites
L9Waites

Leg-by-leg table

9 legs captured
LegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Waites
Set 1 · Leg 2
van Trijp
Set 1 · Leg 3
Waites
Set 1 · Leg 4
van Trijp
Set 1 · Leg 5
Waites
Set 1 · Leg 6
Waites
Set 1 · Leg 7
van Trijp
Set 1 · Leg 8
Waites
Set 1 · Leg 9
Waites

Data coverage

Source and completeness
CoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits9 / 95
Sourceexplicit