Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 2 Apr 2026, 23:24 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerWilliam Borland
Score4–0
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictWilliam Borland won 4–0. The result was driven by a 5.6 point 3-dart average edge for William Borland; a 80.0 percentage point checkout edge for William Borland.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayWilliam BorlandGemma Hayter
84.7
3-dart averageWilliam Borland edge
79
87.4
First 9 averageWilliam Borland edge
75.8
80.0%
Checkout %William Borland edge
0.0%
6
100+Gemma Hayter edge
8
2
140+William Borland edge
0
1
180sWilliam Borland edge
0
97
Highest checkoutWilliam Borland edge
0
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityWilliam Borland created the cleaner scoring base with a 5.6 point edge in 3-dart average.
William Borland was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 80.0 percentage points better on doubles.
William Borland set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 11.6 point First 9 advantage.
Borland W. took the final leg in 16 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsBorland W. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 16 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg84.7
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 2 / 6
Checkout %80.0%
Highest checkout97
Checkouts4/5
3-dart avg79
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 0 / 8
Checkout %0.0%
Highest checkout0
Checkouts0/0
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Borland W.
L2Borland W.
L3Borland W.
L4Borland W.
Leg-by-leg table
4 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Borland W.
17
44
Set 1 · Leg 2
Borland W.
17
41
Set 1 · Leg 3
Borland W.
21
97
Set 1 · Leg 4
Borland W.
16
32
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits4 / 48
Sourcefull_leg_data
