Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 3 Apr 2026, 16:00 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerScott Robertson
Score2–4
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictScott Robertson won 2–4. The result was driven by a 39.0 percentage point checkout edge for Scott Robertson.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayWesley van TrijpScott Robertson
84.4
3-dart averageScott Robertson edge
85
88.1
First 9 averageWesley van Trijp edge
87.6
18.0%
Checkout %Scott Robertson edge
57.0%
7
100+Level
7
4
140+Wesley van Trijp edge
3
1
180sWesley van Trijp edge
0
141
Highest checkoutWesley van Trijp edge
85
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityScott Robertson was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 39.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Robertson S. took the final leg in 17 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsRobertson S. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 17 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg84.4
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 4 / 7
Checkout %18.0%
Highest checkout141
Checkouts2/11
3-dart avg85
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 3 / 7
Checkout %57.0%
Highest checkout85
Checkouts4/7
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1van Trijp W.
L2Robertson S.
L3van Trijp W.
L4Robertson S.
L5Robertson S.
L6Robertson S.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
van Trijp W.
17
48
Set 1 · Leg 2
Robertson S.
18
85
Set 1 · Leg 3
van Trijp W.
18
141
Set 1 · Leg 4
Robertson S.
20
53
Set 1 · Leg 5
Robertson S.
17
56
Set 1 · Leg 6
Robertson S.
17
65
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits6 / 69
Sourcefull_leg_data
