180s1
140+4
100+7
Completed Match
Full breakdown modeModus Super Series • 3 Apr 2026, 16:00 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerScott Robertson
Score2–4
ModeFull breakdown
AI match summary
Awaiting recap signalThis match page now supports a dedicated completed-match recap path, but the post-match summary signal is not populated for this one yet.
Edge result
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There is not enough structured preview output here yet to judge whether the pre-match edge landed.
Player performance comparison
Final stat splitWesley van Trijp avg84.4
Scott Robertson avg85
Wesley van Trijp checkout18.0%
Scott Robertson checkout57.0%
Core match stats
Better values highlightedWesley van TrijpScott Robertson
84.4
3-dart averageScott Robertson edge
85
88.1
First 9 averageWesley van Trijp edge
87.6
18.0%
Checkout %Scott Robertson edge
57.0%
7
100+Level
7
4
140+Wesley van Trijp edge
3
1
180sWesley van Trijp edge
0
141
Highest checkoutWesley van Trijp edge
85
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityScott Robertson was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 39.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volume180s0
140+3
100+7
Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionCheckout %18.0%
Highest checkout141
Checkouts2/11
Checkout %57.0%
Highest checkout85
Checkouts4/7
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1van Trijp W.
L2Robertson S.
L3van Trijp W.
L4Robertson S.
L5Robertson S.
L6Robertson S.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
van Trijp W.
17
48
Set 1 · Leg 2
Robertson S.
18
85
Set 1 · Leg 3
van Trijp W.
18
141
Set 1 · Leg 4
Robertson S.
20
53
Set 1 · Leg 5
Robertson S.
17
56
Set 1 · Leg 6
Robertson S.
17
65
Match stats
2 player rowsvan Trijp W.
3-dart avg84.4
First 988.1
Checkout18.0% (2/11)
180s1
High checkout141
100+ checkouts1
Robertson S.
3-dart avg85
First 987.6
Checkout57.0% (4/7)
180s0
High checkout85
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressScott Robertson closed this out 2–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.