Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityDanny Van Trijp was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 32.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Ray Mulvey set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 2.6 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeRay MulveyDanny Van Trijp Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionRay MulveyCheckout %25.0%
Highest checkout70
Checkouts3/12
Danny Van TrijpCheckout %57.0%
Highest checkout167
Checkouts4/7
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Mulvey R.
L2Van Trijp D.
L3Van Trijp D.
L4Mulvey R.
L5Mulvey R.
L6Van Trijp D.
L7Van Trijp D.
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Mulvey R.
19
10
Set 1 · Leg 2
Van Trijp D.
15Fast leg
167
Set 1 · Leg 3
Van Trijp D.
19
6
Set 1 · Leg 4
Mulvey R.
17
70
Set 1 · Leg 5
Mulvey R.
17
64
Set 1 · Leg 6
Van Trijp D.
17
65
Set 1 · Leg 7
Van Trijp D.
19
40
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg79.9
First 988
Checkout25.0% (3/12)
180s0
High checkout70
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg80.1
First 985.4
Checkout57.0% (4/7)
180s0
High checkout167
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressDanny Van Trijp closed this out 3–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.