Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 3 Apr 2026, 12:07 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerJarred Cole
Score4–1
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictJarred Cole won 4–1. The result was driven by a 5.6 point 3-dart average edge for Jarred Cole; a 21.0 percentage point checkout edge for Danny Van Trijp.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayJarred ColeDanny Van Trijp
78.7
3-dart averageJarred Cole edge
73.1
97.9
First 9 averageJarred Cole edge
76
29.0%
Checkout %Danny Van Trijp edge
50.0%
5
100+Level
5
4
140+Jarred Cole edge
1
1
180sLevel
1
100
Highest checkoutJarred Cole edge
76
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityJarred Cole created the cleaner scoring base with a 5.6 point edge in 3-dart average.
Danny Van Trijp was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 21.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Jarred Cole set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 21.9 point First 9 advantage.
Cole J. took the final leg in 16 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsCole J. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 16 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg78.7
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 4 / 5
Checkout %29.0%
Highest checkout100
Checkouts4/14
3-dart avg73.1
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 1 / 5
Checkout %50.0%
Highest checkout76
Checkouts1/2
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Cole J.
L2Cole J.
L3Cole J.
L4Van Trijp D.
L5Cole J.
Leg-by-leg table
5 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Cole J.
19
36
Set 1 · Leg 2
Cole J.
18
100
Set 1 · Leg 3
Cole J.
22
8
Set 1 · Leg 4
Van Trijp D.
17
76
Set 1 · Leg 5
Cole J.
16
8
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits5 / 62
Sourcefull_leg_data
