Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityPatrick Geeraets was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 19.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Adam Paxton set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 12.7 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumePatrick GeeraetsAdam Paxton Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionPatrick GeeraetsCheckout %46.0%
Highest checkout120
Checkouts6/13
Adam PaxtonCheckout %27.0%
Highest checkout134
Checkouts4/15
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Patrick Geeraets
L2Patrick Geeraets
L3Adam Paxton
L4Patrick Geeraets
L5Adam Paxton
L6Adam Paxton
L7Patrick Geeraets
L8Adam Paxton
L9Patrick Geeraets
L10Patrick Geeraets
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Patrick Geeraets
15Fast leg
120
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Patrick Geeraets
19
20
Set 1 · Leg 3
Adam Paxton
15Fast leg
134
Set 1 · Leg 4
Patrick Geeraets
14Fast leg
25
Set 1 · Leg 5
Adam Paxton
19
50
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 2
Adam Paxton
14Fast leg
80
Set 1 · Leg 7
Patrick Geeraets
17
72
Set 1 · Leg 8
Adam Paxton
13Fast leg
28
Set 1 · Leg 9
Patrick Geeraets
14Fast leg
80
Set 1 · Leg 10Streak of 2
Patrick Geeraets
15Fast leg
96
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg90.6
First 993.7
Checkout46.0% (6/13)
180s2
High checkout120
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg90.4
First 9106.5
Checkout27.0% (4/15)
180s0
High checkout134
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressPatrick Geeraets closed this out 6–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.