Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityWilliam O'Connor created the cleaner scoring base with a 3.3 point edge in 3-dart average.
William O'Connor was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 24.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeWilliam O'ConnorAndreas Harrysson Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionWilliam O'ConnorCheckout %46.0%
Highest checkout102
Checkouts6/13
Andreas HarryssonCheckout %22.0%
Highest checkout46
Checkouts2/9
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Andreas Harrysson
L2William O'Connor
L3William O'Connor
L4William O'Connor
L5Andreas Harrysson
L6William O'Connor
L7William O'Connor
L8William O'Connor
Leg-by-leg table
8 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Andreas Harrysson
14Fast leg
46
Set 1 · Leg 2
William O'Connor
16
32
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 2
William O'Connor
16
12
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 3
William O'Connor
18
100
Set 1 · Leg 5
Andreas Harrysson
16
4
Set 1 · Leg 6
William O'Connor
15Fast leg
102
Set 1 · Leg 7Streak of 2
William O'Connor
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 3
William O'Connor
16
16
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg87.2
First 990.4
Checkout46.0% (6/13)
180s1
High checkout102
100+ checkouts2
3-dart avg83.9
First 988.9
Checkout22.0% (2/9)
180s1
High checkout46
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressWilliam O'Connor closed this out 6–2, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.