Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityCor Dekker was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 15.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Nathan Rafferty set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 3.6 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeCor DekkerNathan Rafferty Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionCor DekkerCheckout %40.0%
Highest checkout123
Checkouts6/15
Nathan RaffertyCheckout %25.0%
Highest checkout80
Checkouts4/16
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Cor Dekker
L2Cor Dekker
L3Nathan Rafferty
L4Nathan Rafferty
L5Cor Dekker
L6Nathan Rafferty
L7Cor Dekker
L8Cor Dekker
L9Nathan Rafferty
L10Cor Dekker
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Cor Dekker
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Cor Dekker
15Fast leg
123
Set 1 · Leg 3
Nathan Rafferty
17
80
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 2
Nathan Rafferty
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 5
Cor Dekker
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 6
Nathan Rafferty
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 7
Cor Dekker
16
18
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 2
Cor Dekker
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 9
Nathan Rafferty
13Fast leg
8
Set 1 · Leg 10
Cor Dekker
14Fast leg
68
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg89.5
First 993.7
Checkout40.0% (6/15)
180s1
High checkout123
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg89.3
First 997.3
Checkout25.0% (4/16)
180s0
High checkout80
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressCor Dekker closed this out 6–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.