Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityJeffrey De Graaf created the cleaner scoring base with a 2.2 point edge in 3-dart average.
Jeffrey De Graaf was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 9.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeFlorian HempelJeffrey De Graaf Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionFlorian HempelCheckout %31.0%
Highest checkout133
Checkouts4/13
Jeffrey De GraafCheckout %40.0%
Highest checkout132
Checkouts6/15
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Jeffrey De Graaf
L2Jeffrey De Graaf
L3Florian Hempel
L4Florian Hempel
L5Jeffrey De Graaf
L6Florian Hempel
L7Jeffrey De Graaf
L8Jeffrey De Graaf
L9Florian Hempel
L10Jeffrey De Graaf
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Jeffrey De Graaf
16
36
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Jeffrey De Graaf
15Fast leg
132
Set 1 · Leg 3
Florian Hempel
19
10
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 2
Florian Hempel
17
52
Set 1 · Leg 5
Jeffrey De Graaf
13Fast leg
36
Set 1 · Leg 6
Florian Hempel
13Fast leg
28
Set 1 · Leg 7
Jeffrey De Graaf
18
100
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 2
Jeffrey De Graaf
16
38
Set 1 · Leg 9
Florian Hempel
12Fast leg
133
Set 1 · Leg 10
Jeffrey De Graaf
12Fast leg
81
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg92.3
First 9103.7
Checkout31.0% (4/13)
180s2
High checkout133
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg94.6
First 9104.9
Checkout40.0% (6/15)
180s2
High checkout132
100+ checkouts2
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressJeffrey De Graaf closed this out 4–6, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.