DartsEdge

Completed Match

Full leg data

Wesley Plaisier

5–6

Jitse Van der Wal

Players Championship 28 • T128 • 30 Sept 2025, 00:00 UTC • Best of 15 legs

WinnerJitse Van der Wal
Score5–6
DataFull leg data

Why this match was won

Post-match verdict

Jitse Van der Wal won 5–6. The result was driven by a 3.2 point 3-dart average edge for Wesley Plaisier; a 7.0 percentage point checkout edge for Jitse Van der Wal; the longest leg run belonging to Wesley Plaisier at 3 legs.

Average gap3.2 ptsWesley Plaisier led the 3-dart average.
Checkout gap7.0 ptsJitse Van der Wal finished cleaner on doubles.
Leg flow3-leg runWesley Plaisier had the longest scoring burst.
Pre-match edgeNo clean edgePrediction unavailable

Pre-match edge post-mortem

Prediction unavailable
No clean edge

There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.

Match comparison

One table, no stat-card cosplay
Wesley PlaisierJitse Van der Wal
94.3
3-dart averageWesley Plaisier edge
91.2
103.7
First 9 averageJitse Van der Wal edge
110.5
28.0%
Checkout %Jitse Van der Wal edge
35.0%
24
100+Jitse Van der Wal edge
27
11
140+Jitse Van der Wal edge
14
3
180sJitse Van der Wal edge
4
56
Highest checkoutJitse Van der Wal edge
113

Key performance insights

Driven by the final stat split and leg availability
Wesley Plaisier created the cleaner scoring base with a 3.2 point edge in 3-dart average.
Jitse Van der Wal was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 7.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Jitse Van der Wal set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 6.8 point First 9 advantage.
Jitse Van der Wal took the final leg in 17 darts, closing the match at 5–6.

Leg-flow story

Runs, breaks, and decisive legs
Wesley Plaisier produced the longest run of the match with 3 legs in a row.
5 legs were won against the throw, which is where the match pressure actually moved.
Jitse Van der Wal closed the final leg at 5–6 in 17 darts.

Scoring and finishing

Volume plus conversion
Wesley Plaisier
3-dart avg94.3
180s / 140+ / 100+3 / 11 / 24
Checkout %28.0%
Highest checkout56
Checkouts5/18
Jitse Van der Wal
3-dart avg91.2
180s / 140+ / 100+4 / 14 / 27
Checkout %35.0%
Highest checkout113
Checkouts6/17

Momentum strip

Match flow by leg
L1Jitse Van der Wal
L2Wesley Plaisier
L3Wesley Plaisier
L4Wesley Plaisier
L5Jitse Van der Wal
L6Jitse Van der Wal
L7Wesley Plaisier
L8Jitse Van der Wal
L9Wesley Plaisier
L10Jitse Van der Wal
L11Jitse Van der Wal

Leg-by-leg table

11 legs captured
LegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Jitse Van der Wal
14Fast leg
25
Set 1 · Leg 2
Wesley Plaisier
17
56
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 2
Wesley Plaisier
19
4
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 3
Wesley Plaisier
16
20
Set 1 · Leg 5
Jitse Van der Wal
11Fast leg
41
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 2
Jitse Van der Wal
15Fast leg
113
Set 1 · Leg 7
Wesley Plaisier
14Fast leg
25
Set 1 · Leg 8
Jitse Van der Wal
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 9
Wesley Plaisier
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 10
Jitse Van der Wal
17
56
Set 1 · Leg 11Streak of 2
Jitse Van der Wal
17
7

Data coverage

Source and completeness
CoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits11 / 115
Sourceexplicit