Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityRicardo Pietreczko was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 17.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeRicardo PietreczkoThomas Lovely Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionRicardo PietreczkoCheckout %40.0%
Highest checkout119
Checkouts6/15
Thomas LovelyCheckout %23.0%
Highest checkout68
Checkouts3/13
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Ricardo Pietreczko
L2Thomas Lovely
L3Ricardo Pietreczko
L4Thomas Lovely
L5Ricardo Pietreczko
L6Ricardo Pietreczko
L7Ricardo Pietreczko
L8Thomas Lovely
L9Ricardo Pietreczko
Leg-by-leg table
9 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Ricardo Pietreczko
22
4
Set 1 · Leg 2
Thomas Lovely
16
32
Set 1 · Leg 3
Ricardo Pietreczko
15Fast leg
119
Set 1 · Leg 4
Thomas Lovely
16
24
Set 1 · Leg 5
Ricardo Pietreczko
16
4
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 2
Ricardo Pietreczko
16
16
Set 1 · Leg 7Streak of 3
Ricardo Pietreczko
12Fast leg
82
Set 1 · Leg 8
Thomas Lovely
14Fast leg
68
Set 1 · Leg 9
Ricardo Pietreczko
17
48
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg87.9
First 997.3
Checkout40.0% (6/15)
180s3
High checkout119
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg87.8
First 997.5
Checkout23.0% (3/13)
180s1
High checkout68
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressRicardo Pietreczko closed this out 6–3, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.