Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityPeter Wright was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 6.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Thomas Lovely set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 6.4 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumePeter WrightThomas Lovely Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionPeter WrightCheckout %44.0%
Highest checkout89
Checkouts4/9
Thomas LovelyCheckout %38.0%
Highest checkout88
Checkouts6/16
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Thomas Lovely
L2Peter Wright
L3Peter Wright
L4Thomas Lovely
L5Peter Wright
L6Thomas Lovely
L7Thomas Lovely
L8Thomas Lovely
L9Peter Wright
L10Thomas Lovely
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Thomas Lovely
14Fast leg
67
Set 1 · Leg 2
Peter Wright
16
20
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 2
Peter Wright
13Fast leg
24
Set 1 · Leg 4
Thomas Lovely
13Fast leg
32
Set 1 · Leg 5
Peter Wright
22
32
Set 1 · Leg 6
Thomas Lovely
18
88
Set 1 · Leg 7Streak of 2
Thomas Lovely
14Fast leg
52
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 3
Thomas Lovely
19
36
Set 1 · Leg 9
Peter Wright
18
89
Set 1 · Leg 10
Thomas Lovely
13Fast leg
40
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg85.9
First 987.4
Checkout44.0% (4/9)
180s2
High checkout89
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg86.9
First 993.8
Checkout38.0% (6/16)
180s2
High checkout88
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressThomas Lovely closed this out 4–6, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.