Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityJack Tweddell was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 15.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeJack TweddellMarvin van Velzen Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionJack TweddellCheckout %40.0%
Highest checkout160
Checkouts6/15
Marvin van VelzenCheckout %25.0%
Highest checkout58
Checkouts4/16
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Jack Tweddell
L2Jack Tweddell
L3Marvin van Velzen
L4Marvin van Velzen
L5Marvin van Velzen
L6Marvin van Velzen
L7Jack Tweddell
L8Jack Tweddell
L9Jack Tweddell
L10Jack Tweddell
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Jack Tweddell
19
40
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Jack Tweddell
14Fast leg
56
Set 1 · Leg 3
Marvin van Velzen
14Fast leg
58
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 2
Marvin van Velzen
19
40
Set 1 · Leg 5Streak of 3
Marvin van Velzen
13Fast leg
32
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 4
Marvin van Velzen
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 7
Jack Tweddell
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 2
Jack Tweddell
15Fast leg
160
Set 1 · Leg 9Streak of 3
Jack Tweddell
17
60
Set 1 · Leg 10Streak of 4
Jack Tweddell
16
20
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg88.1
First 994.1
Checkout40.0% (6/15)
180s3
High checkout160
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg88.4
First 992.9
Checkout25.0% (4/16)
180s3
High checkout58
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressJack Tweddell closed this out 6–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.