Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityThomas Lovely created the cleaner scoring base with a 4.0 point edge in 3-dart average.
Thomas Lovely was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 35.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeNiall CulletonThomas Lovely Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionNiall CulletonCheckout %11.0%
Highest checkout54
Checkouts1/9
Thomas LovelyCheckout %46.0%
Highest checkout56
Checkouts6/13
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Thomas Lovely
L2Thomas Lovely
L3Thomas Lovely
L4Niall Culleton
L5Thomas Lovely
L6Thomas Lovely
L7Thomas Lovely
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Thomas Lovely
17
56
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Thomas Lovely
19
16
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 3
Thomas Lovely
19
32
Set 1 · Leg 4
Niall Culleton
20
54
Set 1 · Leg 5
Thomas Lovely
13Fast leg
38
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 2
Thomas Lovely
13Fast leg
32
Set 1 · Leg 7Streak of 3
Thomas Lovely
14Fast leg
55
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg84.1
First 996.5
Checkout11.0% (1/9)
180s0
High checkout54
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg88.1
First 996.4
Checkout46.0% (6/13)
180s1
High checkout56
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressThomas Lovely closed this out 1–6, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.