Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityChris Landman was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 39.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Jim Long set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 18.9 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeFinishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionJim LongCheckout %7.0%
Highest checkout40
Checkouts1/15
Chris LandmanCheckout %46.0%
Highest checkout76
Checkouts6/13
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Chris Landman
L2Chris Landman
L3Chris Landman
L4Chris Landman
L5Chris Landman
L6Jim Long
L7Chris Landman
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Chris Landman
19
50
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Chris Landman
22
10
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 3
Chris Landman
17
25
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 4
Chris Landman
16
36
Set 1 · Leg 5Streak of 5
Chris Landman
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 6
Jim Long
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 7
Chris Landman
17
76
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg80
First 9104.8
Checkout7.0% (1/15)
180s3
High checkout40
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg79.7
First 986
Checkout46.0% (6/13)
180s1
High checkout76
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressChris Landman closed this out 1–6, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.