Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityKevin Doets was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 10.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeFinishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionKevin DoetsCheckout %35.0%
Highest checkout56
Checkouts6/17
Thomas LovelyCheckout %25.0%
Highest checkout121
Checkouts4/16
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Thomas Lovely
L2Thomas Lovely
L3Kevin Doets
L4Kevin Doets
L5Kevin Doets
L6Thomas Lovely
L7Kevin Doets
L8Thomas Lovely
L9Kevin Doets
L10Kevin Doets
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Thomas Lovely
14Fast leg
56
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Thomas Lovely
18
84
Set 1 · Leg 3
Kevin Doets
19
40
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 2
Kevin Doets
14Fast leg
46
Set 1 · Leg 5Streak of 3
Kevin Doets
11Fast leg
56
Set 1 · Leg 6
Thomas Lovely
17
9
Set 1 · Leg 7
Kevin Doets
13Fast leg
16
Set 1 · Leg 8
Thomas Lovely
12Fast leg
121
Set 1 · Leg 9
Kevin Doets
13Fast leg
26
Set 1 · Leg 10Streak of 2
Kevin Doets
16
24
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg90.3
First 9103.7
Checkout35.0% (6/17)
180s4
High checkout56
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg89.5
First 9102
Checkout25.0% (4/16)
180s2
High checkout121
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressKevin Doets closed this out 6–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.