Completed Match

Full leg data

Players Championship 06 • T32 • 25 Feb 2026, 00:00 UTC • Best of 15 legs

WinnerJurjen Van der Velde
Score6–2
DataFull leg data

Why this match was won

Post-match verdict

Jurjen Van der Velde won 6–2. The result was driven by a 3.2 point 3-dart average edge for Jurjen Van der Velde; a 17.0 percentage point checkout edge for Jurjen Van der Velde; the longest leg run belonging to Jurjen Van der Velde at 4 legs.

Average gap3.2 ptsJurjen Van der Velde led the 3-dart average.
Checkout gap17.0 ptsJurjen Van der Velde finished cleaner on doubles.
Leg flow4-leg runJurjen Van der Velde had the longest scoring burst.
Pre-match edgeNo clean edgePrediction unavailable

Pre-match edge post-mortem

Prediction unavailable
No clean edge

There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.

Match comparison

One table, no stat-card cosplay
Jurjen Van der VeldeDarryl Pilgrim
104.1
3-dart averageJurjen Van der Velde edge
100.9
103.9
First 9 averageJurjen Van der Velde edge
101.4
67.0%
Checkout %Jurjen Van der Velde edge
50.0%
17
100+Darryl Pilgrim edge
19
7
140+Jurjen Van der Velde edge
6
3
180sJurjen Van der Velde edge
1
130
Highest checkoutJurjen Van der Velde edge
108

Key performance insights

Driven by the final stat split and leg availability
Jurjen Van der Velde created the cleaner scoring base with a 3.2 point edge in 3-dart average.
Jurjen Van der Velde was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 17.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Jurjen Van der Velde set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 2.5 point First 9 advantage.
Jurjen van der Velde took the final leg in 12 darts, closing the match at 6–2.

Leg-flow story

Runs, breaks, and decisive legs
Jurjen Van der Velde produced the longest run of the match with 4 legs in a row.
4 legs were won against the throw, which is where the match pressure actually moved.
Jurjen van der Velde closed the final leg at 6–2 in 12 darts.

Scoring and finishing

Volume plus conversion
Jurjen Van der Velde
3-dart avg104.1
180s / 140+ / 100+3 / 7 / 17
Checkout %67.0%
Highest checkout130
Checkouts6/9
Darryl Pilgrim
3-dart avg100.9
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 6 / 19
Checkout %50.0%
Highest checkout108
Checkouts2/4

Momentum strip

Match flow by leg
L1Jurjen van der Velde
L2Jurjen van der Velde
L3Jurjen van der Velde
L4Jurjen van der Velde
L5Darryl Pilgrim
L6Darryl Pilgrim
L7Jurjen van der Velde
L8Jurjen van der Velde

Leg-by-leg table

8 legs captured
LegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Jurjen van der Velde
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Jurjen van der Velde
15Fast leg
118
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 3
Jurjen van der Velde
12Fast leg
130
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 4
Jurjen van der Velde
12Fast leg
96
Set 1 · Leg 5
Darryl Pilgrim
14Fast leg
53
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 2
Darryl Pilgrim
12Fast leg
108
Set 1 · Leg 7
Jurjen van der Velde
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 2
Jurjen van der Velde
12Fast leg
130

Data coverage

Source and completeness
CoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits8 / 72
Sourceexplicit