Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityWilliam O'Connor created the cleaner scoring base with a 3.9 point edge in 3-dart average.
William O'Connor was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 33.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeWilliam O'ConnorYorick Hofkens Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionWilliam O'ConnorCheckout %43.0%
Highest checkout158
Checkouts6/14
Yorick HofkensCheckout %10.0%
Highest checkout86
Checkouts1/10
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Yorick Hofkens
L2William O'Connor
L3William O'Connor
L4William O'Connor
L5William O'Connor
L6William O'Connor
L7William O'Connor
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Yorick Hofkens
12Fast leg
86
Set 1 · Leg 2
William O'Connor
16
36
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 2
William O'Connor
15Fast leg
158
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 3
William O'Connor
16
32
Set 1 · Leg 5Streak of 4
William O'Connor
17
70
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 5
William O'Connor
19
20
Set 1 · Leg 7Streak of 6
William O'Connor
20
60
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg89.4
First 997.3
Checkout43.0% (6/14)
180s0
High checkout158
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg85.5
First 998.7
Checkout10.0% (1/10)
180s1
High checkout86
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressWilliam O'Connor closed this out 6–1, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.