Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityLuke Woodhouse was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 8.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Luke Woodhouse set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 3.7 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeLuke WoodhousePascal Rupprecht Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionLuke WoodhouseCheckout %33.0%
Highest checkout41
Checkouts6/18
Pascal RupprechtCheckout %25.0%
Highest checkout110
Checkouts4/16
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Luke Woodhouse
L2Pascal Rupprecht
L3Luke Woodhouse
L4Luke Woodhouse
L5Pascal Rupprecht
L6Pascal Rupprecht
L7Luke Woodhouse
L8Pascal Rupprecht
L9Luke Woodhouse
L10Luke Woodhouse
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Luke Woodhouse
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 2
Pascal Rupprecht
15Fast leg
82
Set 1 · Leg 3
Luke Woodhouse
17
41
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 2
Luke Woodhouse
16
32
Set 1 · Leg 5
Pascal Rupprecht
14Fast leg
47
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 2
Pascal Rupprecht
16
32
Set 1 · Leg 7
Luke Woodhouse
16
12
Set 1 · Leg 8
Pascal Rupprecht
18
110
Set 1 · Leg 9
Luke Woodhouse
16
20
Set 1 · Leg 10Streak of 2
Luke Woodhouse
16
40
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg88.2
First 997.5
Checkout33.0% (6/18)
180s1
High checkout41
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg88.1
First 993.8
Checkout25.0% (4/16)
180s2
High checkout110
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressLuke Woodhouse closed this out 6–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.