Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityMike De Decker was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 14.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Samuel Price set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 6.3 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeMike De DeckerSamuel Price Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionMike De DeckerCheckout %43.0%
Highest checkout134
Checkouts6/14
Samuel PriceCheckout %29.0%
Highest checkout64
Checkouts4/14
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Samuel Price
L2Samuel Price
L3Samuel Price
L4Mike De Decker
L5Samuel Price
L6Mike De Decker
L7Mike De Decker
L8Mike De Decker
L9Mike De Decker
L10Mike De Decker
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Samuel Price
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Samuel Price
17
60
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 3
Samuel Price
14Fast leg
64
Set 1 · Leg 4
Mike De Decker
12Fast leg
134
Set 1 · Leg 5
Samuel Price
14Fast leg
31
Set 1 · Leg 6
Mike De Decker
19
20
Set 1 · Leg 7Streak of 2
Mike De Decker
18
92
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 3
Mike De Decker
13Fast leg
32
Set 1 · Leg 9Streak of 4
Mike De Decker
15Fast leg
124
Set 1 · Leg 10Streak of 5
Mike De Decker
17
63
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg91.8
First 995.6
Checkout43.0% (6/14)
180s2
High checkout134
100+ checkouts2
3-dart avg91.3
First 9101.8
Checkout29.0% (4/14)
180s2
High checkout64
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressMike De Decker closed this out 6–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.