Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityAlexis Toylo created the cleaner scoring base with a 1.1 point edge in 3-dart average.
Krzysztof Ratajski was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 8.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeKrzysztof RatajskiAlexis Toylo Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionKrzysztof RatajskiCheckout %55.0%
Highest checkout103
Checkouts11/20
Alexis ToyloCheckout %47.0%
Highest checkout160
Checkouts7/15
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Krzysztof Ratajski
L2Krzysztof Ratajski
L3Alexis Toylo
L4Krzysztof Ratajski
L5Krzysztof Ratajski
L6Alexis Toylo
L7Krzysztof Ratajski
L8Alexis Toylo
L9Krzysztof Ratajski
L10Alexis Toylo
L11Krzysztof Ratajski
L12Alexis Toylo
L13Krzysztof Ratajski
L14Alexis Toylo
L15Krzysztof Ratajski
L16Alexis Toylo
L17Krzysztof Ratajski
L18Krzysztof Ratajski
Leg-by-leg table
18 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Krzysztof Ratajski
14Fast leg
72
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Krzysztof Ratajski
16
24
Set 1 · Leg 3
Alexis Toylo
12Fast leg
160
Set 1 · Leg 4
Krzysztof Ratajski
19
14
Set 2 · Leg 1Streak of 2
Krzysztof Ratajski
14Fast leg
78
Set 2 · Leg 2
Alexis Toylo
16
16
Set 2 · Leg 3
Krzysztof Ratajski
13Fast leg
24
Set 2 · Leg 4
Alexis Toylo
15Fast leg
95
Set 2 · Leg 5
Krzysztof Ratajski
14Fast leg
76
Set 3 · Leg 1
Alexis Toylo
17
46
Set 3 · Leg 2
Krzysztof Ratajski
20
31
Set 3 · Leg 3
Alexis Toylo
14Fast leg
25
Set 3 · Leg 4
Krzysztof Ratajski
17
25
Set 3 · Leg 5
Alexis Toylo
15Fast leg
113
Set 4 · Leg 1
Krzysztof Ratajski
12Fast leg
103
Set 4 · Leg 2
Alexis Toylo
11Fast leg
46
Set 4 · Leg 3
Krzysztof Ratajski
13Fast leg
24
Set 4 · Leg 4Streak of 2
Krzysztof Ratajski
13Fast leg
36
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg95.3
First 9103.7
Checkout55.0% (11/20)
180s5
High checkout103
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg96.4
First 9104.9
Checkout47.0% (7/15)
180s5
High checkout160
100+ checkouts2
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressKrzysztof Ratajski closed this out 11–7, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.