180s1
140+6
100+8
Completed Match
Full breakdown modeModus Super Series • 25 Feb 2026, 11:25 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerRon Meulenkamp
Score4–2
ModeFull breakdown
AI match summary
Awaiting recap signalThis match page now supports a dedicated completed-match recap path, but the post-match summary signal is not populated for this one yet.
Edge result
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There is not enough structured preview output here yet to judge whether the pre-match edge landed.
Player performance comparison
Final stat splitRon Meulenkamp avg87.8
Alec Small avg85.6
Ron Meulenkamp checkout36.0%
Alec Small checkout13.0%
Core match stats
Better values highlightedRon MeulenkampAlec Small
87.8
3-dart averageRon Meulenkamp edge
85.6
99.1
First 9 averageAlec Small edge
100.3
36.0%
Checkout %Ron Meulenkamp edge
13.0%
8
100+Alec Small edge
9
6
140+Level
6
1
180sRon Meulenkamp edge
0
106
Highest checkoutRon Meulenkamp edge
64
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityRon Meulenkamp created the cleaner scoring base with a 2.2 point edge in 3-dart average.
Ron Meulenkamp was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 23.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volume180s0
140+6
100+9
Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionCheckout %36.0%
Highest checkout106
Checkouts4/11
Checkout %13.0%
Highest checkout64
Checkouts2/16
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Meulenkamp R.
L2Small A.
L3Meulenkamp R.
L4Small A.
L5Meulenkamp R.
L6Meulenkamp R.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Leg 1
Meulenkamp R.
16
40
Leg 2
Small A.
17
64
Leg 3
Meulenkamp R.
16
40
Leg 4
Small A.
19
4
Leg 5
Meulenkamp R.
16
20
Leg 6
Meulenkamp R.
18
106
Match stats
2 player rowsMeulenkamp R.
3-dart avg87.8
First 999.1
Checkout36.0% (4/11)
180s1
High checkout106
100+ checkouts1
Small A.
3-dart avg85.6
First 9100.3
Checkout13.0% (2/16)
180s0
High checkout64
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressRon Meulenkamp closed this out 4–2, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.