Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityGerwyn Price created the cleaner scoring base with a 3.2 point edge in 3-dart average.
Gian Van Veen was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 7.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeGian Van VeenGerwyn Price Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionGian Van VeenCheckout %40.0%
Highest checkout84
Checkouts6/15
Gerwyn PriceCheckout %33.0%
Highest checkout103
Checkouts4/12
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Gian Van Veen
L2Gerwyn Price
L3Gian Van Veen
L4Gerwyn Price
L5Gian Van Veen
L6Gian Van Veen
L7Gerwyn Price
L8Gian Van Veen
L9Gerwyn Price
L10Gian Van Veen
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Gian Van Veen
15Fast leg
84
Set 1 · Leg 2
Gerwyn Price
14Fast leg
25
Set 1 · Leg 3
Gian Van Veen
13Fast leg
16
Set 1 · Leg 4
Gerwyn Price
15Fast leg
88
Set 1 · Leg 5
Gian Van Veen
14Fast leg
57
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 2
Gian Van Veen
16
16
Set 1 · Leg 7
Gerwyn Price
13Fast leg
16
Set 1 · Leg 8
Gian Van Veen
19
20
Set 1 · Leg 9
Gerwyn Price
15Fast leg
103
Set 1 · Leg 10
Gian Van Veen
16
20
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg89.8
First 996.4
Checkout40.0% (6/15)
180s3
High checkout84
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg93
First 994.9
Checkout33.0% (4/12)
180s2
High checkout103
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressThe edge missed. The simplest culprit is finishing: Gian Van Veen outperformed on doubles, which is often enough to flip a match even when the original pre-match lean looked reasonable. Final score: 6–4.